ANZ raises investor home loan rates

Discussion in 'Loans & Mortgage Brokers' started by turk, 23rd Jul, 2015.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Peter_Tersteeg

    Peter_Tersteeg Mortgage Broker Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,171
    Location:
    03 9877 3000
    This is a fairly sad state of affairs. The majors have already priced themselves out of the market for investors. Their rates were roughly 4.5% whilst competitors are offering deals from about 4.2% - 4.3%.

    From there the ANZ and CBA (WPC and NAB to follow?) have increased rates by 0.27% giving investors a compelling argument to refinance. The rate rise alone will justify refinancing an investment loan of $350k or more. Throw in the fact that the competitors are already cheaper and people have a fairly compelling argument to move.
     
    WattleIdo likes this.
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,991
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Yes very difficult for investors now. Most will find it difficult to refinance because of the severe tightening of servicing calculations. No choice but to stay and pay higher rates - or sell.

    Can things get worse? (yes they can and will!)
     
  3. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,653
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    yes they will, because its easy money and look, its not our fault people.......... its the Anti Competition Unintended Consequences of APRAs guidance :)
     
  4. Jess Peletier

    Jess Peletier Mortgage Broker & Finance Strategy, Aus Wide! Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,685
    Location:
    Perth WA + Buderim Qld
    CBA are increasing their variable for new and existing but their fixed for new only. Might be time to think about fixing if you can't refinance.

    Interestingly, my CBA LOC's will now be cheaper than my SVR! :confused:
     
  5. willair

    willair Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,795
    Location:
    ....UKI nth nsw ....
    Not for anyone who has Banking equities,or the stakeholders in any Bank,always pays to spread it around..
     
  6. Redom

    Redom Mortgage Broker Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    4,658
    Location:
    Sydney (Australia Wide)
    No ones going to increase fixed rates for existing customers - i'm not even sure they're allowed to do that!

    What makes people think the other APRA regulated banks WONT do this?

    I think this is 'macro prudential' - system wide. Not individual banks.

    ANZ...CBA...The rest will fall into line IMO.

    Refinancing now based on price is a bit dramatic. Let the dust settle, and see where it lands.

    Cheers,
    Redom
     
  7. Redom

    Redom Mortgage Broker Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    4,658
    Location:
    Sydney (Australia Wide)
    I also HIGHLY doubt this is just a 'blatant' cash grab.

    Its APRA forcing banks to hold more capital against their investment loans.

    The reason why this smells macro are the lenders involved.

    If it was micro, then the first bank to move on their investment loan book would be Macq or Westpac maybe, not ANZ.

    Cheers,
    Redom
    I
     
  8. KDP

    KDP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    484
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Yep, existing fixed rates are safe.
     
  9. liverpool77

    liverpool77 Active Member

    Joined:
    20th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    42
    Location:
    Sydney
    Will SGB follow if WPAC do or different policies altogether?
     
  10. Kesse

    Kesse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    891
    Location:
    Cairns
    True that Basel III isn't specifically targeted at investors but the capital adequacy ratio is being increased (from 1.2 to 1.8 IIRC) and the banks need to get the $$$ to satisfy that somewhere.

    Two birds, one stone comes to mind.
     
    Redom likes this.
  11. Till Kingdom Come

    Till Kingdom Come Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    129
    Location:
    Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi
    Indeed. That's why it's called fixed. LOL.
     
    Mayjong, S.T and TheSackedWiggle like this.
  12. Till Kingdom Come

    Till Kingdom Come Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    129
    Location:
    Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi
    Would be nice to see another RBA rate cut that flows to PPoR rates now that the IP Dragons have been tamed.
     
  13. THX

    THX Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    843
    Location:
    Sydney
    A question regarding these moves by APRA, do you think they are being prudent or are being somewhat overzealous?
     
  14. Corey Batt

    Corey Batt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,091
    Location:
    Adelaide, SA
    Depends on your view on the role of government. ;)
     
  15. Till Kingdom Come

    Till Kingdom Come Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    129
    Location:
    Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi
    They are catching up from their inaction in the past few years.

    The RBA rate could be much lower now if the APRA fools were not so lazy earlier.
     
    TheSackedWiggle likes this.
  16. THX

    THX Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    843
    Location:
    Sydney
    Dimly :)
     
  17. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,991
    Location:
    Australia wide
    I think APRA is being prudent, but the banks are using this as an excuse to make billions while balancing their books.
     
  18. SaberX

    SaberX Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    29th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    202
    Location:
    WA
    Also be curious to understand how banks assess residential OO vs Investment loans. I mean interest only loans can exist for both.. not to mention what's stopping me from borrowing for OO for my next property and then moving out after a few weeks or even never moving in, and renting it out immediately?? Is there any legal or contractual clauses to cover them for you going down the investment route whilst applying for an OO loan?

    SImilarly my first home purchase is a FHB land and build, but after the relevant time I am looking to rent this out so then this would be an OO loan yet a rental property?

    Be good if some brokers or better still those working in the banking side could clarify? Just wouldn't want to get in any trouble.. but being abit cheeky and stretching the fine lines.... *whistle*

    Oh and per quote above... surely you can just quote your mail address to be your parents or otherwise so they don't send it to your property of purchase/loan?
     
  19. Shahin_Afarin

    Shahin_Afarin Residential and Commercial Broker Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,658
    Location:
    Sydney
    Apparently AMP is about to come out next week and exit investment lending.

    We have a cat 5 storm warning ladies and gentlemen.
     
  20. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,991
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Mail is irrelevant. Doesn't matter where letters are sent and it would cause no suspicions if you changed your mailing address the day after settlement.

    You will need to check the loan agreement which each loan, but generally there is no requirement to obtain a bank's permission to rent out a residential property and generally no notification is needed.

    You could change your mind immediately after purchase and start renting the property. But if you did this with the intention from the beginning then you may be committing a crime by obtaining a financial advantage by deception. However the likelihood of getting charged with this would be extremely small. There could also be civil consequences.