Exactly what im saying... renting gives the better outcome.. so how do Terry and Graeme work out owning is better? Financially i just cant see it.
Can you explain the maths behind this one for me? Lets say for example that there is two identical houses next to each other in the same suburb....
Sorry, can you explain this? My comprehension can be dull sometimes.
But the idea is Terry that instead of purchasing a PPOR, you purchase perhaps two IP's for the same value (2x $100k) and rent a house yourself....
Separate names with a comma.