Hello Cmelderis, Any chance of you attaching the head lease doc mentioned for these? I only have experience with a few community housing head...
Hi Liam, Thanks for the detailed reply. I really wanted to avoid a 'impact assessable' application to give the easement holder, Powerlink,...
Hi Sackie, Having dealt with 'Powerlink' for some time now, we are well and truly on one hell of a ride! If we can keep the house on lot 1 and get...
Hi Marg, Yes, a big discount for the land value has been factored into the calculations. If we can keep the house on lot 1 then it is worth it to...
Hi QAK, Thanks for the reply. I am trying to get this one through as a code assessable subdivision because I do not want the powerline company...
Development footprint plan definition from the BCC. For the 6x14m, 9x14m, or 14x20m rectangles needed for a subdivision approval. Am I reading in...
Hi Liam, Firstly thank you for your well thought out and detailed post, it is really appreciated. For us the numbers do stack up to try and get a...
Hi Marg4000, I have run a 'dial before you dig' search and there is only the sewer line along the rear boundary (like many properties have). So...
Innovative will be a polite way of looking at it, yes. I am thinking the only way will be to make it 2 storeys, and run the garage to the left...
Here is the proposed plan for 3 lots, keeping the house entirely on the first lot. If we are able to get this (or something similar) through we...
Here is the allowable building area supplied by the easement holder. Both existing lots are included in the highlighted area.
My land is Lots 28 and 29 on RP 135034. The left highlighted lot and the one to the left of it.
I own an existing residential (low density) rental property in Durack, Brisbane. Currently it is 2 lots on 1 title, with the lot boundary running...
Separate names with a comma.
